BasketballTips247
Wednesday, March 20, 2019
Sunday, November 9, 2014
The challenges of managing SLA's– kpi itil
The
challenges of managing SLA 's– kpi itil
In this post, you can ref free useful materials about kpi
itil and other materials for kpi itil such as kpi tips, kpi mistakes, kpi
examples, kpi templates, kpi dashboard, kpi form, how to create kpi/performance
metrics
If you
need free ebook:
• List
of free 2436 KPIs
• Top
28 performance appraisal forms
• 11
performance appraisal methods
• 1125
performance review phrases
please
visit: kpi123.com
KPI guides
We are delighted
to post an article on the challenges of managing Service Leve Agreements by
ITIL Standards, by Bill Heffernan of SureSkills.
Service Level
Agreements (SLA ’s) are fundamental to
effective service provision. They provide the basis for managing the
relationship between the service provider and the customer, describing the
agreement between the service provider and customer for the service to be
delivered, including how the service is to be measured. Basically, SLAs are
intended to ensure the provider understands what they are supposed to deliver,
the customer knows what to expect, and both can see (empirically) what is
actually being delivered.
Regrettably, the
‘agreement’ role of the SLA is lost in many organisations, where SLA ’s are used as ‘weapons’ to defend or challenge the
provider or customer. The emphasis for SLAs must be on agreement, and the SLA should not be used to hold either side to ransom. A
true partnership should be developed between the IT service provider and the
customer, enabling a collaborative approach to quality improvement.
Metrics and Key
Performance Indicators (KPI) are a core element of an SLA .
Ineffective or absent KPI can cause a service to fall into disrepute and a
blame culture can develop. KPI for the service must accurately reflect the
expectations and perceptions of both the customer and service provider.
To manage service
provision, we need:
- Service metrics which reflect the
end-to-end quality of service or ‘user experience’
- Process metrics to inform the service
provider and customer of the effectiveness (achieving goals) and
efficiency (use of resources) of key activities within the service
delivery function.
- Technology metrics to inform the IT
provider at the component level, enabling the identification of issues and
improvement opportunities
When considering
SLA KPI we must recognise that Customer perceptions are influenced by:
- Attributes of service that are
indicators of value e.g. relative performance, reliability or security of
a remote workspace service
- Present or prior experience of
similar attributes
- Relative endowment of competitors and
other peers i.e. what they have
- Customers self image or actual
position in market (innovator, market leader, risk taker) i.e. do I expect
leading edge solutions or accept / expect robust security requirements to
access the service
When considering
KPI from an IT perspective, we need to recognise that the customer is not
excessively concerned with how the provider delivers the service and, as such,
is NOT interested in visibility of the majority of KPI which the IT provider
uses to manage the service e.g. component performance. On this basis, component
and process KPI should not be included in the SLA .
They are primarily articulated in Operational Level Agreements and Underpinning
Contracts which underpin the SLA . Obviously,
certain process KPI will overlap with customer expectations for the service
e.g. “95% of incident which impacts more than 50 people in the organisation
will be resolved within 4 hours” – customer expectation and Incident Management
effectiveness KPI.
We also needs to
consider the inclusion of Objective KPI (number of major incidents in a month)
and Subjective KPI (Improvements in customer satisfaction).
Finally, we need
to consider any scope or constraint measurements that may be required to
provide context for current service levels. For example, incident resolution
targets or service performance targets may be defined in the context of the
number of user of the services (up to 500 concurrent users). In this case, we
need to have visibility of the number of concurrent users at any time. It’s a
possible discussion for another day but it is imperative that we always
consider how we are going to measure each aspect of the service, before
including it in the SLA . The mechanism, source
and frequency of data collection, processing, analysis and reporting should be
mutually agreed between the customer and IT service provider.
So, in summary:
You cannot have an
SLA without measurements (KPI)
When selecting
KPI, ask, what indicates value to the customer?
- Enhanced performance in the business
- Constraints removed from the business
- Availability & Reliability of the
Service
- Performance of the service o Security
of the service o Service Continuity (ability to recover from disaster)
Do not include IT
‘management’ KPI i.e. component & process metrics only used by IT.
- Consider “How and how often, can I
measure that?”
- Consider Objectives and Subjective
metrics
Remember scope
measures that may be required for context.
Above all else, do
not forget the #1 rule – Nothing should be included in an SLA
unless it can be effectively monitored and measured at commonly agreed points.
How to Develop Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
Saturday, November 8, 2014
Problem Management KPIs – kpi itil
Problem
Management KPIs – kpi itil
In this post, you can ref free useful materials about kpi
itil and other materials for kpi itil such as kpi tips, kpi mistakes, kpi
examples, kpi templates, kpi dashboard, kpi form, how to create kpi/performance
metrics
If you
need free ebook:
• List
of free 2436 KPIs
• Top
28 performance appraisal forms
• 11
performance appraisal methods
• 1125
performance review phrases
please
visit: kpi123.com
KPI guides
Measuring
effectiveness of the problem management process can be a challenging task at
times. This is because you often do not have enough data if your other
processes are not mature enough. Also, expectations of senior management can
push you to the limits of your analytical skills. For example, what would you
do if you had to provide the "number of incidents prevented last month due
to problems solved"? I am sure you see my point.
Here are the problem management performance indicators, which I find useful:
Here are the problem management performance indicators, which I find useful:
- number of problems registered,
- number of problems solved,
- number and percentage of
problems with root cause identified,
- number and percentage of
problems with workaround available,
- average age of a problem, per
business impact,
- percentage of incidents related to
(caused by) problems in relation to all incidents in a particular time
period,
- update frequency of open problems.
Update frequency is the KPI I like a lot, especially in the early stages of
Problem Management implementation. It shows the regularity of work performed by
Problem Analysts. In order for the process to be effective, work on it must not
be put away forever. It tends to happen if you have your people doing other,
more time-pressing activities in parallel. Many businesses cannot afford the
luxury of having dedicated Problem Analysts and/or Problem Managers. Since
Problem Management puts more focus on quality of analysis than the time of its
completion, you might have issues with people focusing on the job if you don't
have a KPI to monitor it.
The above KPIs should be looked at collectively to determine the quality of your Problem Management activities. You should be concerned if you open few problems the way the police should be concerned if they detect few crimes. They are there, the question is if you can detect them or not. You should also react if any other KPI starts deviate significantly towards its highs or lows. Frequently, if that happens, you can get an idea of what is going on by looking at the other KPIs. Few problems solved? Check your problem update frequency, for example.
Tip for improving all those KPIs: work closely with your Service Desk. After all, they feed you data. Good incident registration process is key for subsequent root-cause analysis.
What is a Key Performance Indicator (KPI)
The above KPIs should be looked at collectively to determine the quality of your Problem Management activities. You should be concerned if you open few problems the way the police should be concerned if they detect few crimes. They are there, the question is if you can detect them or not. You should also react if any other KPI starts deviate significantly towards its highs or lows. Frequently, if that happens, you can get an idea of what is going on by looking at the other KPIs. Few problems solved? Check your problem update frequency, for example.
Tip for improving all those KPIs: work closely with your Service Desk. After all, they feed you data. Good incident registration process is key for subsequent root-cause analysis.
How to Develop Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
Friday, November 7, 2014
List of kpi’s for change management processper itil – kpi itil
List of
kpi’s for change management processper itil – kpi itil
In this post, you can ref free useful materials about kpi
itil and other materials for kpi itil such as kpi tips, kpi mistakes, kpi
examples, kpi templates, kpi dashboard, kpi form, how to create kpi/performance
metrics
If you
need free ebook:
• List
of free 2436 KPIs
• Top
28 performance appraisal forms
• 11
performance appraisal methods
• 1125
performance review phrases
please
visit: kpi123.com
KPI guides
Change management is the important and integral part of service
transitioning not that it helps the services to come alive, but also plays an
important part in the upgrades and restoration.I know what you are thinking restoration of service is Incident Management, but one should keep this in mind that Incident management and Change management is also connecting to each other. Later we Shall look more into this while discussing the KPI’s.
Some of the Key areas of determining the process and service value per change management, by the means of KPI’s are as follows :
Number of successful Changes performed in a particular time frame (Month/Quarter/ Half Yearly)
This will give you a clear output of work value that has been delivered to the client. However there are other factors which are required to look in for attaining this with high ratio.
Number of changes failed due to unforeseen or technical difficulties.
These are required to be minimal but often we have observed that even after doing the successful test run at the time of performing the change it gets failed.
This could be because of any hardware of software glitches.
While performing a critical change minute mistake such reading the disc allocation space would result in disaster , this are pure human error at engineering level.
While performing the change logged into the test server instead of Production machine…
Such instances are rare but not completely ignored while gauging the process and assessment of delivery.
Number of Emergency Changes performed due to or without Incident.
ECR request help in understanding the service flaws and need for improvement in services be it hardware upgrade/ script maintenance/Incident reporting /lead time issue that could have caused this ECR.
Number of Changes performed and completed successfully within the SLA
This gives you a clear idea of how
Number of changes followed the lead time process correctly.
Lead time process and its adherence is important in the lifecycle of a CR any request failing this could easily be rejected or denied. This will cause further delay in service improvement.
Number of changes failed to approve due to some XYZ reason.
This factor will give insight into the approval process and would focus on checking if there is an improvement required to map the process more efficiently to improve the communication and notification among the service provider and customer.
Number of changes rejected during the lifecycle of a CR
Changes rejected due to failure of test results, Impact critical services, not following proper lead time, insufficient impact summary and details…etc
Number of high priority changes performed or high impact CR’s
This will give a clear value and understanding of ability to deliver and carter critical services at any given point of time. However this should have high success rate.
Changes performed during the business hours
There are certain changes which can only be performed during the business hours, due to non availability of different teams and the criticality of the CR’s being minimal and none impacting. Example is change raised to unrack the decommissioned a router as pick and delivery can only be feasible during the business hours.
Changes causing any service interruption during business hours.
There are certain go live projects which would require live users testing and analysis and thus required to be conducted during business hours as service provider one should not overlook this point. It could be rare but not illusive.
How to Develop Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)